The city of Corinth is part of an isthmus about 5 miles wide, which had two harbors. Its western harbor, Lechea, was on the western side of the Grecian peninsula and faced the Adriatic Sea, while its eastern seaport, Cenchrea, faced the Aegean Sea on the eastern side of the peninsula, where the church at Corinth was founded (Romans 16:1). We are told in Acts 18:18 that Paul shaved his head at Cenchrea, because he had a vow, but what was Paul’s vow? The text doesn’t say, but I think we can gain some insight, if we consider what happened to Paul during his visit to the Roman province of Achaia.
First of all, when did Paul make this vow? Again the text doesn’t say, but I believe it implies he may have made it upon the arrival of Silas and Timothy in Corinth (Acts 18:5). It is here that we are told that Paul was “pressed in the spirit” (KJV). The Greek word for “pressed is sunecho (G4912). It is used of the people of the Gadarenes (Luke 8:37) who were “taken” with great fear because of what Jesus had done for the demoniac there. It is used of Jesus in Luke 12:50 when he expressed he was “straightened” for the crucifixion to be over. It is also used in a few places of people “taken” with illnesses. But, I think we can see from these two Scriptures that Paul fervently desired something in his spirit, but what was he desirous of? Well, the text says that Paul was “pressed in the spirit” AND “testified to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ.” However, if this is so, why was Paul so concerned for these Jews in Corinth, since the Scriptures don’t indicate he had taken a vow on the behalf of his countrymen anywhere else?
This leads us to the second indicator for the reason for Paul making his vow. If you have followed me throughout Paul’s missionary journeys, you would see that he met with trouble wherever he had gone. Paul had made a practice of going to the Jew first and then to the gentile. He would begin his testimony in a synagogue, if one were in a city, and seek to persuade the Jews and any gentile God-fearers who might be worshiping there. When he came to Athens, however, it seems the Jews there were of the liberal type that were willing to ‘live and let live,’ so to speak, as it pertained to witnessing to those ignorant of the God of Israel. The text says Paul disputed with the Jews and the devout people in the synagogue, and daily with those who would meet with him in the marketplace (Acts 17:17). Long-story-short, some of the city’s philosophers heard him and had him speak to them at the Areopagus on Mar’s Hill. Paul delivered what is arguably his best recorded speech in the NT, but some mocked him, laughing as they left, while others said “we will hear you again.” In other words, “don’t call us we’ll call you.” Which was worse for Paul, encountering people so excited about the message that they tried to lock him in prison and perhaps kill him or encountering people who mocked and laughed at him, believing him to be a “babbler” – i.e. a “seed-picker” or one who trifles with words, picking up scraps of knowledge where he can?
Paul established churches in Philippi, Thessalonica, and Berea, but in a large city like Athens, only a handful were interested in the God of Israel. The city was so taken with idols, that they had absolutely no regard for truth. Paul was absolutely eloquent in Athens, but his fruit was meager. When he came to Corinth he was determined to “know” nothing but Christ, and him crucified (1Corinthians 2:2). Athens was a bad memory he didn’t want to repeat. He spent his time working at his trade in the marketplace (Acts18:2-3) and disputed with the Jews and God-fearers in the synagogue (Acts 18:4). When Silas and Timothy arrived with their good news about the churches he had planted in Macedonia (Acts 18:5), Paul was both excited and in mourning. He mourned over the harvest fields of Athens and Corinth, but took encouragement over those in Macedonia. It was at this time and for the reasons mentioned that I believe Paul “was pressed in his spirit” and made a vow. Almost immediately afterward, the Jews became antagonistic, but Paul had a vision from Jesus that the harvest in Corinth would be plentiful.
I believe Paul’s vow was that of a Nazarite. It would have been an outward indication to his unbelieving Jewish brethren that Paul was devoting himself to the Lord and his work. Even his shaving his head at Cenchera would have been a sign to them of his intention to sacrifice the appropriate offering in the Temple at Jerusalem, which he did. He set sail for Syria (Acts 18:18), stopping off at Ephesus. He spoke to Jews there, but when they wanted him to stay, he told them he had to keep the feast at Jerusalem (Acts 18:19-21). After he landed at Caesarea, Paul went up (to Jerusalem) and saluted the church there (and made the appropriate offering) and went down to Antioch (Acts 18:22). According to Josephus Paul had 30 days to offer up the appropriate sacrifice after his vow was complete [JOSEPHUS: “Wars of the Jews”, book 2; chapter 15; paragraph 1].
When Paul wrote his letter to the Corinthians he told them to consider their numbers, that not many wise had been called of God (1Corinthians 1:26), thus showing, it is not in wisdom of words, eloquent speeches or great arguments that people are won to the Lord. God looks upon our works and the increase with which he blesses us is inversely proportional to the degree “I” am invested in the Gospel—how much of it is my words, my knowledge and my eloquence (1Corinthians 1:17). God is not impressed with what normally impresses man, so he will not bless this effort abundantly (1Corinthians 1:19). His blessings flow from those who know nothing but Christ and him crucified (1Corinthians 2:2). His is our Wisdom (1Corinthians 1:24, 30). Praise God!
20 responses to “What Was Paul’s Vow?”
Hi Eddie. I found your blog because I was searching to see if anyone else had come up with the same idea that I’ve recently had regarding Paul’s vow in Acts 18. So far, your study of it has come the closest, though it’s not the same. But we do both believe that he made the vow after the arrival of Silas and Timothy. My short study of it is here:
http://web.cloudbow.com/blog/?p=61
Take care and God bless.
Hi there. I read your blog concerning Paul’s vow, but I don’t believe Paul’s vow was for the reason you suggest. The reason being that it was always Paul’s intention to begin preaching in the synagogues of the cities he visited, but then leave once the way was spoken against as evil. He always left with those Jews and Gentile sympathizers and God-fearers who believed his Gospel. It would not be to their benefit to continue in adverse surroundings, so he always rented a place of meeting or took advantage of the good graces of one of the believers who left with him and had a large enough facility to accommodate the new church. There would be no reason to make a vow not to go into the synagogue. Furthermore, this was his usual practice, but the Scriptures are silent concerning any previous or later vow not to enter a synagogue. I don’t see the point of your interpretation, but I did like your pov concerning the similarities of John 9 and Acts 9. I didn’t see this before, but I think it is very interesting and worth pursuing further.
Lord bless
Eddie, I appreciate your comments! You are the second person to respond that way. Do you know off-hand (I’m not expecting you to search for me) where else Paul stated that he would not go to the Jews or not go into the synagogue? I was just wondering if this is the only place recorded where he actually made that statement (which is, by its nature, a vow, even though he didn’t say “I vow…”). Thanks also for your comments about the John 9/Acts 9 similarities. I just love God’s Word!
Hello again. Thank you for your interest in my blog, but I find your interest in the word of God even more refreshing. There are implications of separation in Paul’s visits to both Thessalonica and Berea, but nothing is definite. However, Scripture does show Paul going to and leaving the Jews both earlier and later than his vow in Corinth (Acts 13:46-47, 19:9-10, 28:28). I think this is what you are looking for, if not, don’t hesitate to ask for clarity. I am always willing to discuss the word of God with anyone who drops by.
Have a great day and God bless.
Thanks for those verses, Eddie. I see what you mean. OK, so we both agree on the timing of Paul’s vow, and it seems we even narrow it down to the same couple of verses (around Acts 18:5-6). If I’m reading your article correctly, you say his vow was him “devoting himself completely to the word, solemnly testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ” (Acts 18:5) and I’m saying it was in Acts 18:6 when “he shook out his garments and said to them, ‘Your blood be on your own heads! I am clean. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.’” Since he cut his hair after leaving Corinth, we can also both agree that the vow was in force for the time that he remained there, yes? (I do find it exciting that we are so close on this!) I think your supporting verses, such as 1 Corinthians 2:2 are very good.
On the other hand, you didn’t mention at all the fact that Paul cut his hair, signifying the conclusion of his vow. I think in support of my argument, the proximity of Paul washing his hands clean (to use a phrase used elsewhere for a similar purpose, Matthew 27:24) of their blood has shades of similarity to the description of the Nazarite vow in Numbers 6. WAIT! Reading through Numbers 6, something more is being clarified for me. The resisting, blaspheming Jews, which I thought caused him to make the vow, actually may correspond to a “dead body” that would defile his vow, making the Jews something to avoid BECAUSE of the vow!
Numbers 6:6-9 NASB
(6) ‘All the days of his separation to the LORD he shall not go near to a dead person.
(7) ‘He shall not make himself unclean for his father or for his mother, for his brother or for his sister, when they die, because his separation to God is on his head.
(8) ‘All the days of his separation he is holy to the LORD.
(9) ‘But if a man dies very suddenly beside him and he defiles his dedicated head of hair, then he shall shave his head on the day when he becomes clean; he shall shave it on the seventh day.
Numbers 6:12b – but the former days will be void because his separation was defiled.
This would have the effect of interrupting or defiling his vow, making it necessary to be cleansed and basically BEGINNING THE VOW ANEW (the former days were void).
Perhaps, Eddie, we are both right! I was seeing Acts 18:6 as the start of the vow when it was actually an interruption and renewal of it. What do you think?