The books of Ezra and Nehemiah hold much confusion for Biblical scholars, as far as chronology is concerned. Some conclude Ezra and Nehemiah were contemporaries, while others believe Ezra arrived in Jerusalem over 50 years after Nehemiah’s ministry. Actually, the chronology of the books is very simple, IF, and only if, one decides with Jesus’ conclusion that scripture cannot or must not be read in a manner that forces it to contradict itself (John 10:35). In other words, one must labor to find a way in which two or more passages of scripture will not contradict. If this is done successfully, one would probably hold the truth of the matter in mind. How is this so, or why must this be done? It is because names of places have changed; sometimes people are known by more than one name; indeed, worldviews change from one age to another, so how one looks at something said in the scriptures triggers a different context of understanding than the original. Therefore, if one labors to understand the original meaning of the text, vis-à-vis what it meant to the original audience, one may very well be rewarded with the truth.
Reading genealogies is so boring; isn’t that true? Yet, from time to time, depending on the context of one’s study, they are very revealing. For example, none of the names that we find written in Ezra 8:1-14 are recorded in either the Book of Ezra or the Book of Nehemiah as having assisted in the rebuilding projects of either the Temple of God or the walls surrounding Jerusalem. That should come as a surprise for anyone who believes that the Decree of Artaxerxes had anything to do with either building project, and there are Biblical scholars who believe the decree permitted the building project to continue to its conclusion. Nevertheless, if none of the folks that Artaxerxes released to rebuild the Temple or the city are found to have participated in that labor, how can anyone conclude the Decree of Artaxerxes had anything to do with the Seventy Weeks Prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27?
The labor of building the Temple began with Zerubbabel, the governor of Judah, and Joshua, the high priest. It was they and those with them who rebuilt the Altar of God on the Feast of Trumpets, immediately following their coming to Jerusalem after being released by Cyrus from their captivity in Babylon (Ezra 3:1-3), and the Seventy Weeks Prophecy begins there. Moreover, the project of rebuilding the Temple continued from the second month of the second year, after being released from Babylon (Ezra 3:8). Additionally, the text claims that, after both the leaders and the rest of the men who came out of the captivity, vis-à-vis the folks listed in the genealogy found in chapter two of the Book of Ezra, laid the foundations of the Temple, they paused to celebrate the fruit of their labor (Ezra 3:8-13). Nevertheless, after about a year or two, and after no little frustration created by the Samaritans, the labor ceased by the order of Cambyses, king of Persia (Ezra 4:1-6).
It didn’t begin again until the coming of Nehemiah, and it is reveled in his account that the building project included the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s walls (Nehemiah 4:1-7). Moreover, those who took part on this building project included the folks of the generation that was born in Judah after the children of the captivity returned to Jerusalem from Babylon, and they are listed in chapter three of the Book of Nehemiah! In each case, the name mentioned lists his father/grandfather as being one of those who returned to Jerusalem from Babylon with Zerubbabel, the governor, and Joshua, the high priest.[1] Genealogies are boring to read, but they are important to show some very important things, including the timeframe, showing when certain events occurred, and who was involved. So, let me repeat, none of the names listed in Ezra 8:1-14 who returned with Ezra in the seventh year of Artaxerxes, the king of Persia (cp. Ezra 7:7), participated in the building project at Jerusalem. What can we conclude from this point? The conclusion of the matter is that Ezra and company arrived after the building project was over. The Temple was already completed, and its dedication was celebrated a year prior to the release of Ezra (Ezra 6:15-18). Moreover, the city and its walls were also complete, and Ezra and company arrived in Jerusalem just in time (a few weeks prior), to participate in the celebration of dedicating the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 12:27, 35-36).
_______________________________________________________
[1] For example, Eliashib, the officiating high priest during the days when Nehemiah was in authority over the building project at Jerusalem, helped build the wall beginning at the Sheep Gate (Nehemiah 3:1). He was the grandson of Joshua the high priest, who had come up from the captivity (Nehemiah 12:10; cp. Ezra 2:2). Meremoth built the wall near the Fish Gate (Nehemiah 3:3), and he was the son of Urijah (Nehemiah 3:4), the son of Koz (cp. Ezra 2:61), and so on.
Smoodock's Blog 
146 responses to “The Chief Men Who Returned with Ezra”
Simply not accurate. Ezra and the Men of the Great Assembly sealed the T’NaCH the mystic work Daniel being one of the last Books included.
[[[My friend, you have a huge problem here. You present yourself as an authority, but you aren’t.]]] Sat as a Great Sanhedrin judge early in the 21st Century. A simple Yid who moved people from House to House.
I work, travel to Jerusalem, change my clothes and sit as one of the 71 Sanhedrin justices.
Utterly moronic stupidity on the order of UN Resolution 242 which first coined “Occupied Territories” based upon the corrupt premise that it violates “international law” to acquire land through War. The absolute narishkeit of this Great Power Security Council imperialism/avoda zarah abomination, likewise compares to UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism!
Judea and Samaria the inheritance of the Jewish people. The pejorative word “settlement” promotes Great Power Security Council imperialism in the Middle East. Aimed to force an Israeli surrender similar to the Nazi surrender following its defeat in WWII. There, the great powers forced a mass population transfer of Germans from Prussia and caused Poland to acquire land through War!!! Prussia the heart of the 2nd Germanic empire prior to WWI. How many times has the Alsace Lorraine switched from French to German and back again to France consequent to the spoils of War?
Sure you did. You, showed no respect, saying his office was bought and paid for.
[[[Well, not only do you condemn the Jews who believed Jesus was the Messiah in the first century AD, but you also condemn the high priest, saying he was bought and paid for, and you condemn the chief rabbi today.]]] Stating a cultural tradition fact. The chief rabbi a political position. Just that simple. That’s just a simple fact.
You did it again. The Jews’ chief rabbi earns nothing; if he has enough money he buys his office. He could be an ignoramus, because all it takes is a few dollars and presto he can lead the Jews. Is that correct? Tell me you’re not judging this person, saying he can be ignored in your faith.
So, Adam was exiled/cast out of the Garden, not for anything he did or didn’t do. He was exiled in order to develop the major theme of the Tanakh: G’lut/exile. If this is true, then the whole story of Adam is unnecessary. Why not create the man in exile? Why make it look like he did something wrong?
Therefore, the Mishna and the Talmud cannot be used as evidence that the Tanakh was closed during the time of Ezra. Jews translated the scriptures into the Greek at the request of one of the kings of Egypt, and they included many of the books that are not included in the Tanakh. Why would they do such a thing, if they knew certain books they included didn’t belong in the Tanakh?